1 - 2 FEBRUARY, 2018 - SHIPS LOG
SCUTTLEBUTT: see below
EVENTS: see below
NOTES: got some serious email comments in last night (the 31st) about the Harbors security cameras . . . they ramped up all day long... and overnight the 1st to total around 50, so I wrote up the following;
after turning your EMP white noise scrambler-jammer on . . . just a “heads up” from the
blogsite comment page last night 31 January, 2018, but, we thought that YOU should be
aware as well.
be photographed or video recorded by CCTV, Big Brother, employers, etc; and we see warning
signage posted in many places every day, BUT, “audio” recorded (monitored)?
the corner of the transit-”A” dock intersect facing Otter, and two on the ramp phone pole---one
facing East down Amber Novelli’s dock, the other facing South down “A” dock) have audio
microphones!, their specs boast a 60-75 foot (normal talking dB) pickup range;there are many
other cameras elsewhere in the system as well.
rail, or planned their families day standing in front of the ICM dumpsters, paused at the
“A”-dock/transit dock corner to talk, stood between the Frank F. and Otter, sat aboard
Oceansrising’s stern deck, carried on a conversation outside someone’s boat, or walked down
the “A” dock ramp area to/from Amber Novelli’s, were being potentially eavesdropped on
, listened to, and recorded without their knowledge or permission.
illegal to listen to, monitor or record audio conversations without the consent of the parties
involved. Since Federal wiretap law makes it illegal to record oral communication, most security
cameras usually lack audio as it would put them in the surveillance category.
attempt to intercept, or get any other person to intercept, any wire or oral communication
without the consent of any parties to the conversation. Unless one is a party to the
conversation or has received consent from one of the parties, it is illegal to obtain any part
of a telecommunication or a radio communication, the courts have also ruled that one cannot
use a device to record a conversation unless all parties of the conversation are informed.
in an electronic communication to record or disclose the contents of said communication. But,
remembering It is unlawful to record an in-person communication without the consent of all
that the privacy and unauthorized (unknown and un-permissioned) use of audio recordings
(void of any signage or warnings) has violated many hundreds (possibly thousands) of harbor
visitors, tourists, tenants, business customers and the general public’s rights of privacy, as
protected per Federal and Oregon Law statutes.
“sound pickup” (like motion) is only used as a camera-on trigger, and no one ever “listened”,
“recorded” or "shared" any audio (now debunked).
can/does influence thinking, actions and responses by the devices owner or management team
who cannot (consciously or subconsciously) “unhear” or remove the audio input knowledge
from prejudicing any future decision-makings or opinions.
comment just been received about whether or not ICM is aware of the listening device and the
ongoing violation their customers are being exposed to, while another commentor is reviewing
a public class action potential.